
After the conference we had in Milan with Yehuda Safran we asked him to focus about the meaning of our work (an generally about western architects work) in places like Dharavi.
Here we post his answer as a starting point for us to direct our work throught the next experiences.
Q:
Why is it useful that Western architects work on places like Dharavi? Which side is the one taking bigger advantage of this relationship?
A:
Architecture is not unlike the idea of a just world.
Just as a just world can be divided but has to be observed universally, so is architecture.
Just as a just world can be divided but has to be observed universally, so is architecture.
If we can not provide for the super poor we will not be able to provide for the less poor.
Most people live in the ignorance of the interdependence of one group on another.
The relative wealth of Milano and Boston is closely related to the relative poverty in Mumbai and Lagos. If we could help set up a model of conduct in Mumbai, much else every where would effected.
There is a world wide reciprocity which if we will ignore, it will be to our peril.
Yehuda Safran








